The Federal Circuit Breathes More Life Into Claim Preambles

By Stephen B. Schott Claim preambles are given little weight in claim interpretation, which is seemingly incongruous with the amount of scrutiny courts give to all the other words in patent claims. But the Federal Circuit recently breathed just a little more life into preambles in Pacing Technologies, Inc. v. Garmin International, Inc. The decision focused on US…

Read More

Towards More Reliable Trial Court Decisions On Claim Construction

By Stephen B. Schott The Federal Circuit, which has exclusive domain over patent-related appeals, overrules district court findings at an alarming rate. The Supreme Court has decided that turnabout is fair play. Continuing a string of reversals or at least in this case remands, the Supreme Court recently overturned years of Federal Circuit precedent and outlined a new standard…

Read More

Most (and Least) Popular IdeaEsq Articles of 2014

By Stephen B. Schott In 2014, I published 39 articles. My goal was one a week so I fell short, even counting some lame efforts. But still, 39 is a good number and based on the analytics, here are the top and bottom three articles from the last year. Please be kind to those bottom three. They need your love,…

Read More

Federal Circuit Identifies Software as Patentable Subject Matter (post Alice)

By Stephen B. Schott Software has been patentable subject matter for a long time but following this summer’s Supreme Court Alice v. CLS Bank decision, exactly when software crosses into patentable subject matter territory has been in flux. Last week, the Federal Circuit’s DDR Holdings, LLC v. Hotels.com, L.P. et al. decision provided some guidance on this point. The patent in dispute describes what…

Read More

IP Law For Startups: A Primer Presentation

I gave this short presentation at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School this past week. The idea was to introduce the students to the IP issues they may see at the beginning of their startup cycle, and only briefly touch upon the IP issues they might see at the end. If you have questions, contact me.If…

Read More

A Beautiful Mind Nobel Laureate’s Theory Is No Good For Calculating Patent Damages

Imagine you own several patents for software related to video calling over wireless networks. And further imagine that a mobile phone manufacturer uses a built-in program that you believe infringes your patents. The question that the Federal Circuit in VirnetX v. Cisco faced was: Is an infringing damages calculation based on the price of the entire phone,…

Read More

The Rise of the Startup Manufacturer

An Article in Schott, P.C.’s IP Law For Start-ups SeriesBy Stephen B. Schott “Some software startup founders are evolving into product startup founders. It’s an interesting trend.” A product startup founder said this to me over coffee a few months ago. Since then, I’ve been giving what he said some consideration. Has the time of the startup…

Read More

Patentable Subject Matter: The USPTO’s Guidelines after Alice

An Article in Schott, P.C.’s IP Law For Start-ups SeriesBy Stephen B. Schott As promised when the Supreme Court issued Alice, the answer to the question “What is patentable?” will be developing over the next several years. But just a few weeks removed from the decision, the USPTO has issued the first of its guidelines for how it will…

Read More